← Back to pace chart

Even splits vs negative splits

Most marathoners slow down in the second half. The goal of a pacing strategy isn’t to “be brave” early — it’s to arrive at 30–35km with enough energy to keep running well.

Quick definitions

When even splits works best

Even splits can be excellent when the course and conditions make them realistic:

Even splits is simple to execute — but it leaves less margin for error if you misjudge fitness or the day turns tough.

When negative splits is the better bet

For most runners, a slight negative split (or at least a controlled first half) improves your chance of a good result:

The real advantage: negative-split thinking forces patience early — and patience is what saves your last 12km.

How big should a negative split be?

Keep it realistic. Huge negative splits are rare outside elite racing. A practical target for many runners is:

If conditions are hot or hilly, replace “negative split” with even effort and judge success by how well you hold form late.

Even pace vs even effort (the missing concept)

Most real races are not perfectly flat, calm, and cool. That’s why many runners do better thinking in even effort:

If you keep effort controlled early, you give yourself permission to race late — which is where your time is actually decided.

Decision checklist (2 minutes)

A practical pacing plan (that actually works)

Worked example: a “safe” 4:30 plan

If your goal is 4:30:00, your strict checkpoint targets are roughly:

CheckpointTarget time
10 km1:03:59
Half marathon2:15:00
30 km3:11:58
40 km4:15:57

A conservative negative-split mindset could mean arriving at halfway 30–60 seconds “behind” those targets — then trying to hold steady effort through 30km before pushing late if you still feel good.

What if you started too fast?

This happens — especially with adrenaline and crowds. The fix is immediate and unemotional:

Trying to “win back” 30–60 seconds with a surge often costs minutes later.

Fueling: the hidden split strategy

Late slowdowns are often as much about fueling as fitness. A pacing plan that includes consistent fueling is easier to hold:

Use goal pages for exact targets

For exact splits and checkpoint targets, use the calculator and your goal-time pages:

Pacing for a PB vs pacing to finish strong

Your split choice should match your goal:

Both approaches reward patience. The difference is how aggressively you’re willing to “spend” effort after 30–35km.

Checkpoint anchors that prevent blow-ups

If you only watch a few numbers, watch these:

Common mistakes that ruin pacing

FAQ

Is negative split always best?
Not always. On hot, windy, or hilly courses, “even effort” is often better than chasing an exact negative split.

What should my halfway split be?
If you’re pacing conservatively, being 30–90 seconds slower than strict even-pace is common and can set up a stronger finish.

Can beginners run even splits?
It’s possible, but beginners are more likely to benefit from a conservative first half to reduce blow-up risk.

What if I feel amazing at 10km?
Great — keep it controlled. Feeling great at 10km is normal. The goal is to feel “still okay” at 32km.

Should I speed up if I’m behind the pace chart?
Usually no. Return to your planned effort and rhythm. Avoid surges; they’re expensive.

How do I pace hills?
Run even effort: accept a slower pace uphill, and regain gently downhill without spiking effort.

Does fueling affect split strategy?
Yes. Poor fueling increases late-race slowdown. A disciplined first half plus consistent fueling improves your chance of holding pace late.